Sarah Baram

you must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you. RB

Tag: News

Come One, Come All

These next coming days will probably be the only days I stick to a severely biased news network and do not mind doing so. Why? Well, because for once, they are beyond right and I cannot seem to do anything but nod in agreement with them. The network? Fox News… Now, please, stop shaking your finger at me. The issue? Immigration. I know, immigration has been so drawn out and chatted about it is almost unnerving.  But, as long as there are border hoppers and illegal workers illegal immigration will always be relevant, so why not chat some more concerning it?

Everyone knows the deal with illegal immigration. I mean deal as in definition, so far very few parties have made out well in this illegal situation and I am sure you can guess by process of elimination that so far, America has not been one of them. In 2007, America’s immigrant population reached 37.9 million, this including both legal and illegal immigrants.  This statistic translates roughly to one in eight of those residing in America to be immigrants. If one would like to go further and know how many of those immigrants happen to be illegal, it is about one in three. Where do many of them hail from? Nearly half of the Mexican immigrants in America are here illegally, along with one half of Central American immigrants and one-third of South American immigrants. It may sound like the singling out of an ethnicity, but it’s not, it is just a cold hard truth.

With this constant flow of negative statistics, a person has to wonder: why are these immigrants coming, and staying, illegally? Is it for the American Dream of that darling cape with a white picket fence? Ah, to have two full sized bathrooms and a breakfast nook. Or is it because they are safer here in the good ole’ United States? I mean, who really wants to stay in Mexico with this unending drug war? No hands? I didn’t think so. Then what is it?

If you could enter a country, nearly free of financial cost, send your children to school without having to pay taxes, and possibly receive government financial aid, wouldn’t you jump on that border crossing band wagon? Welcome to America, land of the free.

I know, illegal immigrants do participate in their share of work, and at a depressingly low cost. Remember, this low cost is generally paid under the table, tax-free. It is that cost that makes these illegal immigrants attractive, and so employable by corporations and small businesses alike. Actually, so employable that they are among the highest percentage of employed people residing in New York City today. Citing recent Census statistics, Mexicans, as the one of the largest immigrant groups present in New York City, are more likely to be employed than an actual New York City native. This employable nonsense is not something that is only harbored in New York City; it is spreading among the country too. Illegal immigrants are taking jobs that should rightfully be handed to those who live in America, legally.

If only the problem with illegal immigration stopped with those who have become employed over legal American citizens. There is also the crime to think about. First off, illegal immigration is a crime punishable by the United States government. A family of illegal immigrants crossing American borders and staying undermines America’s national security and puts a drain on national funding. Though, statistics can be found that illegal immigrants are less likely than an American native to commit a heinous crime due to fear of being deported, isn’t living in America illegally and forcing Americans to pay the way heinous enough?

If all of this is true, then why did Stephen Colbert appear in Congress fighting for rights of immigrants currently residing and working in the United States? He may like to speak out for those who are not usually heard, and fight for their rights but… Why would you give an illegal resident Constitutional rights? I may not have been there when the Bill of Rights was first drafted, but I am immensely confident that “We the People” meant Americans, and those legally residing in America.

Colbert’s show of meager intelligence and mockery was just that, nothing more. Essentially, his satirical notion came down to those illegal immigrants holding agricultural jobs. Colbert, before addressing Congress did participate in a day’s work to become a sort of self-proclaimed expert.

“And the farm work? It is hard. Really, really hard. You have to bend over to pick things a lot. It turns out – and I did not know this – most soil is at ground level.”

- Stephen Colbert

Farm work may be grueling, but does that mean a legal American would deny such a job? I would like to think the answer to that question would be a ‘no’.

Stephen Colbert’s appearance may have been nothing more than a headache inducer, but the Democratic Party seems intent on making illegal immigration more of an everlasting migraine. It looks as if Colbert may have had one thing right, many of them may be out of jobs come November.

This notion in turn brings me to The DREAM (Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors) Act. If I were to go with the nutshell explanation of what The DREAM Act really is, I would tell you it is amnesty for illegal immigrants between the ages of twelve and thirty-five. Oh yes, amnesty. How? By receiving credits in higher education or serving proper military service, those illegal immigrants previously in the United States for five years, can apply and be granted American citizenship. The cost? Well, that would mean American taxes paying for those four years of high school, and the possible years before that, required by any higher education institution. And an illegal immigrant participating opts to go in to the military? Those positions are paid once boot camp is completely. So yes, the Democratic Party wants to pay illegal immigrants to become legal.

Then, what does the Republican Party so desire within the realms of illegal immigration? Do not fret; this issue was rightfully addressed in their newest “Pledge to America”.

1.     Establish Operational Control of the Border: We must take action to secure our borders, and that action starts with enforcing our laws. We will ensure that the Border Patrol has the tools and authorities to establish operational control at the border and prohibit the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture from interfering with Border Patrol enforcement activities on federal lands.

2.     Work with State and Local Officials to Enforce Our Immigration Laws: The problem of illegal immigration and Mexican drug cartels engaged in an increasingly violent conflict means we need all hands on deck to address this challenge. We will reaffirm the authority of state and local law enforcement to assist in the enforcement of all federal immigration laws.

3.     Strengthen Visa Security: To stop terrorists like Omar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the Christmas Day bomber, we will require the Department of Homeland Security to review all visa applications at high-risk consular posts and prevent aliens from attempting to avoid deportation after having their visas revoked.

This whole debate may sound like it is leaking from a Conservative’s mouth, or maybe even a Tea Partier’s political leanings but isn’t it just common sense that illegal immigrants are illegal? This then striking the possibilities of a well-rounded education, employment opportunities and equal rights… Away? That is what I had though, but who knows, maybe it’s not common sense and somewhere along the way a large group of Americans forgot what “We the People” truly means. Or, maybe that meaning has just evolved in to more of a “Come one, Come all, here is my open wallet” type of interpretation.

What Bristol Palin Says About American Families… And ‘Mama Grizzlies’

Two years ago Bristol Palin was an irresistible voice for teenage pregnancy. She followed in the steps behind her mother, Sarah Palin, supporting her candidacy as a vice presidential nominee. At 17 years old, she was vibrant, and looked like what a stereotypical teen should look like; she was realistic, yet pregnant. The McCain camp never tried to hide Bristol’s pregnancy, or her rugged self proclaimed “fuckin’ redneck” fiancé either; it was just a fact that the Republican nominee for vice president had a young pregnant daughter. That fact then became the notion that the Palin family was just like modern families today, suffering all the traditional woes of teens engaging in sexual intercourse improperly. Forget angst, where are the condoms?

Then something happened. Barack Obama won the presidency, and before the American public knew it, Sarah Palin resigned as Governor of Alaska. Then? Bristol Palin left home, with Tripp of course, but without Levi… Tripp’s father.

The young Palin is now coming in to her own as a sort of media necessity. But, it did not start that way. It began with Bristol Palin working with the Candie’s Foundation to tell teens that teen pregnancy does have negative consequences, despite what they may think. Now, Palin is simply on a speaker’s circuit. The cost of her coming is horribly steep: $15,000 to $30,000.

Now Bristol Palin, Levi Johnson and the young Tripp have graced the cover of Us Weekly. This time they are not speaking out against teenage pregnancy, or engaging in safe sexual practices. Instead, they were announcing their engagement to the world. And by world, they were announcing the engagement to everyone for the first time, even their parents. Needless to say, this cover story was a bold move, even immature and distasteful.

The traditional engagement, most often involves the father and mother of the soon to be possible bride giving the man asking her hand permission to propose to their daughter. Then comes the proposal, and the frantic phone calls to each family member to say “We’re getting married!” So far, Bristol Palin and Levi Johnston have shown us they are not forging on the traditional route, but another one. A route much less traveled, and much more publicized.

For Levi Johnston this media move does not say much different about him than we already know. We have heard him publicly bash the Palin family, then apologize, and we have even seen him sprawled out in the nude for Playgirl. Of all the things Levi Johnston has partaken in these past two years, this may be the most mild, yet still a whirlwind in the media journey of a young man.

But for Bristol, this says something much different about her than the norm. And not just about her, but her mother too. With the recent ‘Mama Grizzlies’ campaign and Bristol Palin’s unwillingness to reveal her engagement to her mother out of fear of her reaction, should ‘Mama Grizzlies’ forewarn us of mean conservative mothers instead of mother’s protective of their “cubs”?

The fear Bristol Palin has of her mother shows us something. The Palin family may resemble an every day family, but why is Bristol Palin that scared? Is there a side of Sarah Palin that the American public is missing out on? Bristol Palin said of the wide reveal and her mother: “It is intimidating and scary just to think about what her reaction is going to be. Hopefully she will jump on board.” Then came this statement from Todd and Sarah Palin both: “Bristol at 19 is now a young adult. We obviously want what’s best for our children. Bristol believes in redemption and forgiveness to a degree most of us struggle to put in practice in our lives.”

Maybe the ‘Mama Grizzlies’ campaign should stay a political thing, and be pushed from the relationship it could have within the Palin family. But personally, I think Bristol Palin’s move to go straight to the media with her engagement and not her family first is enlightening.

Now, the rumors are that Bristol Palin and Levi Johnston are shopping reality shows. Their rep is denying this rumor, but wouldn’t it make sense? Sarah Palin went from Governor of Alaska to a Fox commentator. If the apple does not fall far from the tree then Bristol may be pushing the same career path as her infamous and much sought after mother.

If the rekindled romance is fact, and not a stunt, then a ‘Best of Luck’ is in order for the young couple that due to statistics may suffer a failed marriage. We have seen the couple crash and burn once before, correct? And the burning was so awful. Who knows, maybe this time things will be different especially with Bristol Palin’s fantastic ability to forgive.

Prescribed Vaginal Pleasure

Lotus-sex-position

Image via Wikipedia

Men have penises and women have vaginas, it is that simple. When you were young, you may have had the defining moment in the bathtub with a sibling of the opposite sex finding yourself asking, “Mommy, why doesn’t Annie have what I have?” And Mommy will say something simple that does not include what one day you will come to find out: The genitalia you have will one day provide a pleasure you could never have imagined. That pleasure? Sex, whether it is with yourself or with someone else, you will one-day experience it.

Alas, one day a problem arose. Sexual pleasure was threatened by the villain of this story, the villain became known medically as a low libido. Publicity wise, men were the primary gender affected by our villain. Pharmaceutical companies took swift action and created Viagra. You know, the drug with the really, really, awkward commercials? That one. Then came Cialis, and they just so happened to have an awkward commercial too. And after that? Gas stations started selling “trustworthy” herbal remedies that promised instant hardness and a long night of sexual satisfaction for you and your partner. For the most part, the villain was stricken from the bedroom and creaking bedposts were heard once again.

Today, the villain has arisen once again. This time, the low libido is attempting to disgrace a woman’s ability to experience sexual pleasure. Some women experience numbness while others just do not feel like doing much at all. Where are the pharmaceutical companies in this dry mess? Germany, with a company called Boehringer Ingelheim. Hm, that sounds oddly familiar.

“The panel, the Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee, voted against a new drug application by Boehringer Ingelheim, a German pharmaceutical company. Dr. Julia V. Johnson, the panel’s chairwoman, said that the drug’s impact was “not robust enough to justify the risks,” which include dizziness, nausea and fatigue, particularly with long-term daily use. “

-       Drug for Sexual Desire Disorder Opposed by Panel by Duff Wilson

Common side effects of Viagra and Cialis are headaches, nausea, indigestion and photophobia. If men can handle those side effects and manage to engage in sexual intercourse then I would like to think that women can man up to deal with the side effects that could possibly stem from using flibanserin as a sexual accomplice. The only problem I can see with the “female Viagra” is the name. F-l-i-b-a-n-s-e-r-i-n, that’s a mouthful.

As a young twenty-something, I have never come to understand why women are treated so differently sexually. If a woman sleeps with more than say, five men, some may consider her a ‘whore’. If a man did that? High fives all around. Is the FDA’s disapproval of flibanserin just another sexual double standard between males and females? Must we return to the bathtub and remember the simplicity of our sexual organs? Viagra and Cialis make for a better sex life for males, it’s called erectile dysfunction not ‘I want to get laid more’. Therefore, it’s a medical problem. So why, when it comes to females, do the risks outweigh the possible sexual impact? It does for males, so why not us too?

June 15, 2010: Oval Office Presidential Address

As Americans, we have many addictions. We have crutches, we have wants that we believe are needs. In short, we have oil. As Americans we have an undeniable need for oil, we rely on it. Americans cannot breathe without oil.  Oil, however, has its limits, it is not infinite, and it does not reproduce. As Americans, we have been reminded of this repeatedly and each time, the echo seems to fade quickly, and now, here we stand.

President Barack Obama’s first Oval Office address speaks of the tragic consequences taking place in the Gulf after the Deep Horizon oil spill. The speech was mediocre, at best. Listening now to newscasters and political commentators on CNN and Fox, they think just about the same. We get it, BP made many mistakes at Deep Horizon. The privately owned British company possibly cut corners and created a potentially dangerous situation that unfortunately did occur. It has been addressed by the news media and the public has voiced their complaints.

How long is it going to take to rid the Gulf Coast of BP’s oil? In two weeks, 90% will have likely been captured. This estimate comes from straight from BP and contains a big ‘if’. As of now, the remedy has hardly been planned and the estimations of leaking oil daily have been faithfully rising.

How will the fishermen be compensated for their hurt finances? This afternoon, President Obama informed BP’s CEO that BP must rely on a third party to disperse funds appropriately, an agreed $20B. Looking back to Exxon Valdez, this payment will be a long and tricky process, four years of $5B a year due for the BP disaster. Keep in mind, however, many of those who lost their careers to Exxon Valdez, never actually saw payment.

Americans, and those residing in the directly affected areas of BP’s spill know that BP did not handle their fault in a desirable manner. They left the public in the dark while tar balls washed up on Florida shores. Then, they poured money in to a “we are very sorry but please, still love us” type advertising campaign that cost upward of fifty million dollars. Well, now the fault is beginning to lie a bit with the CEO Tony Hayward of no longer BP, but President Barack Obama.

The speech American’s craved to hear before 8:00PM Tuesday evening would have addressed a direct manner of capturing the oil. President Obama is not a scientist, but Americans can rest assured he knows at least one with a plan for this “epidemic”. Where was it tonight?

President Obama compared the BP spill to a war. He pulled out the big words, using “siege”, and naming the enemy: BP, and presenting a sort of “battle plan”, at least he thought. The company does need to be held accountable, but President Obama forgot to mention one thing. BP is the number one foreign supplier of oil to the United States military while in Afghanistan. Should he be reprimanding them so harshly without extending a more worthwhile helping hand?

It has been weeks since Deep Horizon exploded, taking eleven lives and tainting the coast. BP has successfully proven they need the help of the United States in capturing the estimated 60,000 barrels of oil gushing daily. Currently, President Barack Obama has done nothing but talk sternly. The oil may be “assaulting our shores and our citizens” but President Obama has failed to give BP the correct aid to correct their mistakes.

Oval Office addresses are rare. They are considered addresses concerning national security issues, and used sparingly. Oval Office addresses mean business. Tuesday evening’s address, however, felt more like a reprimand from afar, something you would receive from your parents for spilling the milk. As I am sure President Obama knows, this oil is far from milk on the kitchen floor.